Pixel-based data modifying method and device

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a method of modifying data in an encoded data signal  125  corresponding to successive pictures divided into sub-pictures, for providing an output modified data signal  126 . In particular, this invention can be used for the insertion of an additional data signal  127  into a compressed video signal  125 . The proposed schemes according to the invention are based on a transcoder arrangement including at least partial decoding means and partial re-encoding means. This method leads to a cost-effective solution compared to the prior art comprising a minimum number of functional sub-steps, in particular including a unique motion compensation sub-step  205 , taking advantage of simplifications and combinations between different sub-steps.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method of modifying data in anencoded data signal, comprising at least:

-   -   a decoding step for decoding said encoded data signal and        providing a decoded data signal,    -   a re-encoding step performed on a modified data signal and        generating a coding error,    -   a prediction step for providing a motion-compensated signal from        said coding error and comprising at least a subtracting sub-step        between an input data signal obtained at least from said decoded        data signal and said motion-compensated signal for obtaining        said modified data signal.

The invention also relates to video processing devices for carrying outsaid method. This invention, may be used, for example, when abroadcaster wants to introduce additional data into a sequence of codedpictures. This invention finds applications not just in the field ofMPEG-2 compression, but more generally in any digital video datacompression system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Modifying data in an encoded data signal has become a vital function instudio editing environments. A possible solution has been proposed inthe international patent application WO 99/51033 (PHF98546). This patentapplication describes a method and its corresponding device formodifying data in an encoded data signal. This method allows anadditional data signal insertion, e.g. a logo inserting, into an MPEG-2bitstream thanks to bit rate transcoding. Logo insertion comes as anextension of the bit rate transcoder. The corresponding diagram,depicted in FIG. 1, comprises a transcoding module 101 and a logoaddition branch 102. The general outline of the transcoding module 101,well known to a person skilled in the art, comprises:

-   -   a residue decoding branch 118 for receiving the input signal 125        and providing a decoded data signal Error_I(n). This branch        comprises in series a variable length decoding 107, an inverse        quantization 108 followed by an inverse discrete cosine        transform 109.    -   a re-encoding/decoding branch 120 for providing the output        signal 126 and its decoded version respectively. The re-encoding        part, for providing said output signal, comprises in series a        discrete cosine transform 110, a quantization 111, a variable        length coding 112 followed by a buffer 113, and regulation means        114 ensuring a constant picture quality of the output signal        126, and a first subtracter 122 generating a coding error. The        decoding part comprises in series an inverse quantization 115        followed by an inverse discrete cosine transform 116.    -   an intermediate branch 119 comprising a motion compensation 105        using motion vectors V(n) of the input signal, its associated        memory 106 storing a previous signal, and a second subtracter        123. This branch, also called prediction loop, avoids the        quality drift in the output signal by applying a motion        compensation to said coding error generated during the        re-encoding step.        The logo addition branch 102 is implemented thanks to a residue        addition to the decoded signal Error_I(n), by means of the        adding sub-step 121. This residue is formed by subtracting an        additional data signal Logo(n) referenced 127 with a        motion-compensated logo prediction referenced 129, obtained by        means of the motion compensation sub-step 103, which is based on        reference pictures containing logo previously stored in memory        104 and which uses the same vectors V(n) as the main input        signal.

In the prior art diagram depicted in FIG. 1, two motion compensationsare performed: a first one 105, well known and provided for correctingthe quality drift on P and B pictures introduced by the quantizationsub-step 111, and a second one 103 on an additional data signal 127.This motion compensation 103 generates said motion compensated signalPRED(Logo(n−1), V(n)) referenced 129 which is subtracted from saidsignal 127. Said motion-compensated signal is indeed essential since itcancels undesired parts of the signal relative to signal 127, previouslymotion-compensated by 105, in the input signal of the re-encoding step.Moreover, as a motion compensation always requires a storage of aprevious signal, two memories 104 and 106 are also needed. Then, withthese two motion compensation operations and two memory blocks, thissolution remains not only complex as regards the CPU burden, but alsoexpensive as regards storage memory.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide a method of modifying datain an encoded data signal which requires less memory capacity and puts alesser burden on central processing units (CPU).

The method of modifying data according to the invention is characterizedin that it comprises:

-   -   a first sub-step for adding an additional data signal to said        decoded data signal, for providing said input data signal,    -   a second sub-step for adding said additional data signal to said        coding error, said motion-compensated signal resulting from the        motion compensation of the output signal of said second adding        sub-step.

A variant of the previously characterized method is also proposed. It ischaracterized in that it comprises a sub-step for adding an additionaldata signal to said modified data signal, before said re-encoding step.

The corresponding diagrams, depicted in FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 respectively,are based on data addition in the pixel domain of the additional datasignal 127 with the decoded data signal relative to the input datasignal, or with signal situated in the transcoder drift correction loop,by means of said adding sub-steps.

According to the invention, in contrast to the prior art solution, nomore separate motion compensation is applied to logo data since themotion compensation relative to logo data is merged with the motioncompensation relative to the drift correction of the transcoder loop.The invention thus comprises a minimum number of functional sub-steps,leading to a cost-effective solution. Indeed, only one set of motioncompensations and its associated memory storage is used, whichsimplification is possible in that advantage is taken of combinationsbetween different sub-steps, and by using their own characteristics suchas the linearity of the motion compensation.

Another object of the invention is to propose devices for carrying outthe above-mentioned methods.

To this end, the invention relates in a first implementation, to atranscoding device for adding data to an encoded data signal,comprising:

-   -   a first means for adding an additional data signal to said        decoded data signal for providing said input data signal,    -   a second means for adding said additional data signal to said        coding error, said motion-compensated signal resulting from the        motion compensation of the output signal of said second means.

In a second implementation, the invention also relates to a transcodingdevice for adding data to an encoded data signal, characterized in thatit comprises means for adding an additional data signal to said modifieddata signal, before re-encoding means.

Detailed explanations and other aspects of the invention are givenbelow.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The particular aspects of the invention will now be explained withreference to the embodiments described hereinafter and considered inconnection with the accompanying drawings, in which identical parts orsub-steps are designated in the same manner:

FIG. 1 illustrates the outline, as known in the prior art, of atranscoder with its logo insertion branch,

FIG. 2 illustrates a first embodiment of the technical solutionaccording to the present invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates a second embodiment of the technical solutionaccording to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

As was stated above, the present invention aims at reducing the cost ofthe prior art method for modifying data in an encoded data signal. Suchan invention is well adapted to the case of MPEG-2 coded video signalsas the input signal, but it will be apparent to a person skilled in theart that such a method is applicable to any coded signal that has beenencoded with a block-based compression method such as, for example, theone described in MPEG-4, H.261 or H.263 standards. In the following, theinvention will be detailed assuming that encoded video signals complywith the MPEG-2 international video standard (Moving Pictures ExpertsGroup, ISO/IEC 13818-2).

FIG. 2 depicts the first cost-effective arrangement for data insertioninto an encoded data signal, according to the present invention. Thisarrangement re-uses the aim of the transcoder described above, intowhich are inserted sub-steps aiming at modifying the input signal.Indeed, the input signal is modified by a pixel-based data signal 127simultaneously introduced owing to two adding sub-steps:

-   -   the sub-step 121 placed at the output of the error residue        decoding, more precisely on the output signal of the inverse        discrete cosine transform 109. The modification of the input        signal, e.g. in the case of a logo insertion, is therefore first        implemented by means of an addition between the inserted data        signal 127 and the incoming data signal Error_I(n). This        addition results in a signal corresponding to the positive input        of the subtracting sub-step 123.    -   the sub-step 124 at the input of the memory 206 relative to the        motion compensation 205.        The modification of the input signal, e.g. in case of a logo        addition, is therefore secondly implemented by means of an        addition between the inserted data signal 127 and the output        signal of the subtracting sub-step 122. This addition results in        a signal corresponding to the input signal of the memory 206.

From an algorithmic point of view, this first arrangement proposedaccording to the invention is equivalent to the one described in theprior art of FIG. 1, as it can be recursively demonstrated hereinafter.

The following notations will be adopted for the demonstration:

-   -   V(n): vectors of picture number n,    -   I(n): decoded input picture number n,    -   Error_I(n): error residue of input picture number n,    -   O1 (n): decoded picture number n corresponding to the output        signal of FIG. 1,    -   MEM1(n): picture number n stored in the frame memory 106,    -   O2(n): decoded picture number n corresponding to the output        signal of FIG. 2,    -   MEM2(n): picture number n stored in the frame memory 206,    -   PRED(X(n), V(n+1)): motion compensation of picture X(n) using        vectors V(n+1). It corresponds to a predicted version of picture        X(n+1),    -   T: transform defined by T(x)=IDCT(IQ(Q(DCT(x)))).        Note that the decoded pictures I(n), O1(n) and O2(n) are not        represented by any figures since only compressed signals are        accessible.        The equivalence between the prior art and the diagram of FIG. 2        will be demonstrated if for each n, the three following        relations are valid:        O1(n)=O2(n)  1)        MEM1(n)=O1(n)−1(n)−Logo(n)  2)        MEM2(n)=O2(n)−1(n)  3)        Obviously, the input signal and the inserted data signal 127 of        FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are supposed to be identical in this        demonstration.

For the case where n=0, corresponding to an Intra-coded picture, it canbe written:Error _(—) I(0)=I(0)  4)It can be deduced from FIG. 1:O1(0)=T(I(0)+Logo(0))  5)MEM1(0)=O1(0)−I(0)−Logo(0)  6)It can be deduced from FIG. 2:O2(0)=T(I(0)+Logo(0))  7)MEM2(0)=O2(0)−I(0)  8)It is possible to conclude from relations (5), (6), (7) and (8) thatrelations (1), (2) and (3) are valid for n=0. Let us suppose they arestill valid at the rank n, and let us demonstrate that (1), (2) and (3)are also valid at the rank (n+1).Let us now introduce the terms A(n+1) and B(n+1) as:A(n+1)=Error _(—) I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(Logo(n), V(n+1))−PRED(MEM1(n),V(n+1))B(n+1)=Error _(—) I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(MEM2(n), V(n+1))Since (2) and (3) are valid at the rank n, and since the motioncompensation is linear, A(n+1) and B(n+1) become:A(n+1)=Error _(—) I(n+1)+PRED(I(n), V(n+1))+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O1(n),V(n+1))  9)A(n+1)=I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O1(n), V(n+1))  10)B(n+1)=Error _(—) I(n+1)+PRED(I(n), V(n+1))+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O2(n),V(n+1))  11)B(n+1)=I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O2(n), V(n+1))  12)Since (1) is valid for at the rank n, relations (10) and (12) become:A(n+1)=B(n+1)=I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O1(n), V(n+1))  13)It can be deduced from FIG. 1 and FIG. 2:O1(n+1)=T(A(n+1))+PRED(O1(n), V(n+1))  14)MEM1(n+1)=T(A(n+1)−A(n+1)  15)O2(n+1)=T(B(n+1))+PRED(O2(n), V(n+1))  16)MEM2(n+1)=T(B(n+1))−B(n+1)+Logo(n+1)  17)One can conclude from relations (13), (15) and (17) thatMEM1(n+1)=O1(n+1)−I(n+1)−Logo(n+1)  18)MEM2(n+1)=O2(n+1)−I(n+1)  19)This means that relations (1), (2) and (3) are valid for the rank n+1,which proves the algorithmic equivalence between the arrangement of FIG.1 of the prior art, and the first proposed arrangement depicted in FIG.2 according to the invention. This proposed arrangement thus ensuresthat the modified output signal has the same quality as the one of theprior art but is obtained in a more cost-effective manner. Indeed, nomore separate motion compensation and its associated memory is neededfor the inserted data signal 127, since said data can be directlyinserted into the transcoding pseudo-prediction loop, thissimplification being justified by the linearity of the motioncompensation. This merging of the two motion compensations—if theinsertion of the two adding sub-steps 121 and 124, at no cost for mostdigital signal processors, is disregarded—represents a substantial gainin terms of CPU occupation as well as memory storage.

FIG. 3 depicts an alternative embodiment of the present invention. It isalso based on a transcoder arrangement identical to the one previouslydescribed and depicted in FIG. 1. Compared with a transcoderarchitecture such as the one depicted in FIG. 1, only a fewmodifications are made to obtain a change in the input signal. Indeed,the input signal is modified by signal 127 introduced by means of onlyone adding sub-step 121 placed at the input of the re-encoding step,more precisely on the input signal of the discrete cosine transform 110.The modification of the input signal, e.g. in the case of a logoaddition, is therefore implemented by means of an addition between theinserted data signal 127 and the output signal of the subtractingsub-step 123. This addition results in a signal corresponding to theinput of the discrete cosine transform 110. From an algorithmic point ofview, this second arrangement is also equivalent to the prior artarrangement of FIG. 1.

The following notations will be used for the demonstration:

-   -   O3(n): decoded picture number n corresponding to the output        signal of FIG. 3,    -   MEM3(n): picture number n stored in the frame memory 206.        Note that the decoded pictures O3(n) is not represented by any        figures since only compressed signals are accessible.        The same recursive demonstration can be made in proving for each        n, the three following equations:        O1(n)=O3(n)  20)        MEM1(n)=O1(n)−I(n)−Logo(n)  (2) (as demonstrated above)        MEM3(n)=O3(n)−I(n)  21)        Obviously, the input signal and the inserted data signal 127 of        FIG. 1 and FIG. 3 are supposed to be identical in this        demonstration.        For the case where n=0, corresponding to an Intra-coded picture,        it can be written:        Error _(—) I(0)=I(0)  22)        It can be deduced from FIG. 3:        O3(0)=T(I(0)+Logo(0))  23)        MEM3(0)=O3(0)−I(0)  24)        From relations (5), (6), (23) and (24), it is possible to        conclude that relations (20) and (21) are valid for n=0. Let us        suppose they are still valid at the rank n, and let us        demonstrate that (20) and (21) are also valid at the rank (n+1).        Let us now introduce the terms C(n+1) as:        C(n+1)=Error _(—) I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(MEM3(n), V(n+1))        Since (21) are valid at the rank n, and since the motion        compensation is linear, C(n+1) becomes:        C(n+1)=Error _(—) I(n+1)+PRED(I(n),        V(n+1))+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O3(n), V(n+1))  25)        C(n+1)=I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O3(n), V(n+1))  26)        Since (20) is valid for the rank n, relation (26) becomes:        A(n+1)=C(n+1)=I(n+1)+Logo(n+1)−PRED(O1(n), V(n+1))  27)        It can be deduced from FIG. 3:        O3(n+1)=T(C(n+1))+PRED(O3(n), V(n+1))  28)        MEM3(n+1)=T(C(n+1))−C(n+1)+Logo(n+1)  29)        It can be concluded from relations (15), (27) and (29), that:        MEM3(n+1)=O3(n+1)−I(n+1)  30)

So relations (20) and (21) are valid for the rank n+1. This proposedscheme thus ensures that identical results will be obtained in theoutput signals of FIG. 1 and FIG. 3. No more separate motioncompensation and its associated memory on signal 127 are needed, andsaid pixel-based data signal 127 is introduced thanks to the onlyno-cost adding sub-step ADD. In terms of CPU occupation and memorystorage, this solution in almost the same as the one of an isolatedtranscoder without data insertion, which is remarkable.

In FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 described above according to the invention, theinput signal data is modified thanks to the insertion of the pixel-baseddata signal 127 by means of adding sub-steps. These inserted data maycorrespond to a logo, i.e. a single small picture, or a ticker, i.e.successive small different pictures. In both cases, each picture must bepixel-based, e.g. by being encoded according to the so-called bitmapformat which corresponds to a rough digital image coding. Of course,before insertion by means of the adding sub-steps, said signal 127 mayderive from an adapted pixel-based signal Logo_ori(n) referenced 328 inorder to optimize the quality of the output signal, as it is onlyrepresented in FIG. 3 with step 317, for example by changing theluminance or the chrominance levels, as far as their format is stillcompatible. It is obvious that such an adaptation does not restrict thescope and the degree of protection of the present invention.

This method of modifying data in an encoded data signal can beimplemented in several manners, such as by means of wired electroniccircuits or, alternatively, by means of a set of instructions stored ina computer-readable medium, said instructions replacing at least aportion of said circuits and being executable under the control of acomputer or a digital processor in order to carry out the same functionsas fulfilled in said replaced portions. The invention then also relatesto a computer-readable medium comprising a software module that includescomputer executable instructions for performing the steps, or somesteps, of the method described above.

1. (canceled)
 2. A method of modifying data in an encoded data signalcomprising: a) a decoding step for decoding said encoded data signal andproviding a decoded data signal, b) a re-encoding step performed on amodified data signal and generating a coding error, c) a prediction stepfor providing a motion-compensated signal from said coding error andcomprising at least a subtracting sub-step between an input data signalobtained at least from said decoded data signal and saidmotion-compensated signal for obtaining said modified data signal,characterized in that it comprises a sub-step for adding an additionaldata signal to said modified data signal, before said re-encoding step.3-5. (canceled)
 6. A computer program product for a transcoding devicefor adding data to an encoded data signal, comprising a set ofinstructions which, when loaded into said device, causes said device tocarry out the method as claimed in claim 2.